beautiful writing as always! I had a question regarding this:
"I had myself read Weil, and reflected on her obedience to God (or Lord God, or just Lord to us of the lesser hand)"
could you better explain the distinction between the usage of the term Lord God and Lord here in etiquette? More specifically, is the sinister use of simply 'Lord' meant to be reflecting of a less abstract relationship to God? I don't think that you've written on this topic specifically elsewhere, so I was curious, thank you so much! 😊🙏
happy thanksgiving emily and thank you for writing me & the compliments;
i think you might be the first person to write me a question about the programmings, and the faith topics through it;
to your question: i /believe/ i had written it in one of the earlier programmings (near the start of the glassware story, maybe), but i:m not positive myself; the term GOD and LORD and LORD GOD are divided between the hands based on conjecture (important to note, because it is not a communicated truth and only an extrapolation i have made based upon communicated truth; prone to human error, and miscommunication) of the Trinity and the Quaternity--
this may make your eyes roll--
GOD is three letters, and therein maps to the trinity just by virtue of that connection; LORD is four, and maps onto the quaternal cast by the trinity--and this is our birth of the sinister hand as shadow of the trinity;
LORD GOD is a cross chiral combination of the two hands, joined at the body;
so: it has less to do with a relationship that is more/less abstract, and solely to do with a conjecture based upon a pattern within the language, in-turn based upon the relationship of the qlifotic shadow to the trinity.
thank you for taking the time to write me back! please, don't think you may be making my eyes roll! i have a poor personal understanding of the relationship to numbers specifically, but i have a deep trust in your understanding & would not be asking if I did not mean it. 🙂↕️🙂↕️
i went back, and you were right, it is (briefly) mentioned on the November 2nd programming, though not as explained, so I appreciate you taking the time to explain it to me! have a good day 😋
beautiful writing as always! I had a question regarding this:
"I had myself read Weil, and reflected on her obedience to God (or Lord God, or just Lord to us of the lesser hand)"
could you better explain the distinction between the usage of the term Lord God and Lord here in etiquette? More specifically, is the sinister use of simply 'Lord' meant to be reflecting of a less abstract relationship to God? I don't think that you've written on this topic specifically elsewhere, so I was curious, thank you so much! 😊🙏
happy thanksgiving emily and thank you for writing me & the compliments;
i think you might be the first person to write me a question about the programmings, and the faith topics through it;
to your question: i /believe/ i had written it in one of the earlier programmings (near the start of the glassware story, maybe), but i:m not positive myself; the term GOD and LORD and LORD GOD are divided between the hands based on conjecture (important to note, because it is not a communicated truth and only an extrapolation i have made based upon communicated truth; prone to human error, and miscommunication) of the Trinity and the Quaternity--
this may make your eyes roll--
GOD is three letters, and therein maps to the trinity just by virtue of that connection; LORD is four, and maps onto the quaternal cast by the trinity--and this is our birth of the sinister hand as shadow of the trinity;
LORD GOD is a cross chiral combination of the two hands, joined at the body;
so: it has less to do with a relationship that is more/less abstract, and solely to do with a conjecture based upon a pattern within the language, in-turn based upon the relationship of the qlifotic shadow to the trinity.
thank you for taking the time to write me back! please, don't think you may be making my eyes roll! i have a poor personal understanding of the relationship to numbers specifically, but i have a deep trust in your understanding & would not be asking if I did not mean it. 🙂↕️🙂↕️
i went back, and you were right, it is (briefly) mentioned on the November 2nd programming, though not as explained, so I appreciate you taking the time to explain it to me! have a good day 😋